margaret rodgers
  • HOME
  • RECENT WORK
  • SERIES
    • Solar Prints
    • CloseUps
    • Ghost Piano Series
    • Out of TIme
    • BIG GIRLS
    • FOUR STICKS
    • Money etc.
    • Renewal
    • BOLA Drawings
    • Flowers for Saranac
  • Blog
    • Banners
  • EXHIBITIONS
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2011
    • NY Story
    • RED
  • BIO
  • WRITINGS
    • ACADEMIC WRITING
    • Women in . . .
  • Store
  • Catalogue
  • RECENT WORK

Thinking about photographs

3/3/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I started this a while back and am reminded to finish it by the recent opening of the Clarington Museums exhibition Rediscovering Identity: The Power of Photography. This is a multi dimensional exhibit that allows visitors to explore many facets of the medium, its mechanics as well as its history. Local artists were asked to interpret a photograph from the archives, so several IRIS members jumped at the chance to do some portraiture and I chose a photograph of what I assume to be two sisters, dressed to the nines and looking a little nonplussed.

Special guest speaker at the opening was Steven Frank, who spoke about the history of photography, and showed some 19C - early 20C artifacts such as a stereoscope, wonderful leather bound album, and postcard book.

Photographer Jean Michel Komarnicki recently commented that it isn't a photograph until it's printed, and that got me thinking about our existences within Walter Benjamin's famous age of mechanical reproduction. We are rapidly moving out of this era as the evanescent digital age overtakes us, and as the majority of images that we capture never become hard copy.


As JMK pointed out, technological changes as well as material degradation of discs may make digital records unreadable in time.  And how about those rapidly fading colour prints from the 1960s? Artists are still, of course creating photographs, mostly printed digitally, but with archival considerations. But the family photos that record so much of daily life, special events, travels etc. are mostly shown on screens rather that stored in albums.  It is noteworthy, as Frank mentioned, that when disaster destroys peoples' homes the victims invariably mention the loss of those family albums. They tell the stories of our lives and become the stories that are remembered.

But they are going.

The earliest extant photograph is believed to be "View from the Window at Le Gras" by Nicéphore Niépce in 1826 or 1827. So figuring that by 2025 or so there won't be any more family albums, we can look at this two hundred year period as the age of the photograph. While the latter 20th century will have the richest repository of printed memories, it is possible to look at pictures taken before 1900 and gain a sense of how people dressed, celebrated, wanted themselves to be recorded. Those long exposure times invite an equally long examination of the images.

Will future generations have this privilege?









0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    October 2017
    August 2016
    April 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All
    1950s
    Appropriation
    Art
    Books
    Cards
    Cat
    Childhood
    Christmas
    Curating
    Darwin
    Dionne Quintuplets
    Feminism
    Galleries
    Hydro Towers
    Language
    Mail
    Navajo
    Opportunities
    Photography
    Picnic
    Suburbia
    Women Studies
    Worms
    Xmas

    RSS Feed

Margaret Rodgers | Canada